Collage image showing Penon woman,  human foot and university logos
Home
Research
Collaborators
Background
Royal Society Exhibition
British Museum Demonstration
Newsroom
Links

 

 

Liverpool John Moores University logo

Link to Liverpool John Moores University web site

 

Why are the footprints important? Location of the footprints and background How were the footprints preserved? Classifying the footprints Mapping and Preserving the Footprints Dating methods used New dating results The ‘Peopling of the Americas’ research programme

 

 

 

Bournemouth University logo

 

Link to Bournemouth University web site


Research

Why are the footprints important?

 

The footprints research is vitally important for the study of the settlement of the Americas because it:

 

  1. Provides extensively validated data that directly challenges current theories on the peopling of the Americas.
    The presence of 40,000 years old human footprints means that the ‘Clovis First’ model of human occupation can no longer be accepted as the first evidence of human presence in the Americas. New routes of migration that explain the existence of these much earlier sites now need urgent consideration.

  2. Re-confirms the significance of Central Mexico as one of the most important areas for the study of early human occupation in the Americas.
    The research reported here supports a much earlier human migration than is currently accepted – with colonisation at around 40,000 years ago compared to 11,500 years ago as proposed by the Clovis First Model.

  3. Indicates that other suggested early occupation sites in the Americas should be re-evaluated carefully in a wider continental scale approach, rather than as isolated sites.

  4. Proves that the Valsequillo region has considerable potential for further studies of ancient human and animal footprints.
    The Xalnene Ash occurs extensively within the Valsequillo Basin and further sites with human and animal footprints have been observed by the team in the area. Further investigation of the ‘Xalnene ash footprint layer’ may yield further data, enabling researchers to provide a more precise calculation of the height, pace and stride of the human population present. Such research would also give a better understanding of the association between animals and humans at this time.

  5. Adds to the global archive of human prints.
    The presence of ancient human and animal prints is a rare occurrence in nature, because it requires special conditions for their preservation. The Valsequillo Basin footprints add to this literature and reflect specific environmental conditions for their preservation within this area of Central Mexico.

    Well documented examples include the Laetoli prints in East Africa, the Roccamonfina prints in Italy; the Mesolithic prints from the Severn estuary and the Mesolithic to Bronze Age Formby footprints in the UK.

    There are also reports of supposed Late Pleistocene human footprints preserved in volcanic sequences from Amanalco de Becerra (Estado de México) and middle Holocene from Acahualinca in Nicaragua.

  6. Helps to solve the archaeological controversy relating to the dating of the Valsequillo deposits. The research helps to resolve the controversy related to the antiquity of the archaeological (lithics and worked bone) and megafaunal remains that were reported in several archaeological sites scattered around the Valsequillo Basin (Hueyatlaco, El Horno, Barranca Caulapan) found in the Valsequillo Gravels in the 1960s and 1970s by Cynthia Irving Williams and Juan Armenta. The new dating evidence presented here, indicates that they are Late Pleistocene in age (approx. 20,000 to 40,000 years ago). A Mexican research team lead by Patricia Ochoa from the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (INAH) in collaboration with Michael Waters of Texas A & M University has undertaken new excavation work at the original archaeological site of Hueyatlaco, so new results are expected soon on the association of megafaunal remains and lithics atthis site.


Return to top of page

 

 
Natural Environment Research Council's  logo WC3 HTML 4.01 WC3 CSS Copyright © 2005 Liverpool John Moores University - Bournemouth University